↓ Skip to main content

Tai Chi for osteopenic women: design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Tai Chi for osteopenic women: design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter M Wayne, Julie E Buring, Roger B Davis, Ellen M Connors, Paolo Bonato, Benjamin Patritti, Mary Fischer, Gloria Y Yeh, Calvin J Cohen, Danette Carroll, Douglas P Kiel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 25%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Unspecified 14 10%
Other 40 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 28%
Unspecified 25 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Sports and Recreations 13 9%
Psychology 11 8%
Other 39 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,762,735
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,520
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,077
of 263,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them