The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
FACS-based purification of Arabidopsis microspores, sperm cells and vegetative nuclei
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-8-44 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Filipe Borges, Rui Gardner, Telma Lopes, Joseph P Calarco, Leonor C Boavida, R Keith Slotkin, Robert A Martienssen, Jörg D Becker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
Ireland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 139 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 38 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 25% |
Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 63% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 17 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,915,761
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#443
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,739
of 175,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them