↓ Skip to main content

Improving rural and remote practitioners' knowledge of the diabetic foot: findings from an educational intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Improving rural and remote practitioners' knowledge of the diabetic foot: findings from an educational intervention
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13047-016-0157-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah E. Schoen, Kaniz Gausia, David G. Glance, Sandra C. Thompson

Abstract

This study aimed to determine knowledge of national guidelines for diabetic foot assessment and risk stratification by rural and remote healthcare professionals in Western Australia and their implementation in practice. Assessment of diabetic foot knowledge, availability of equipment and delivery of foot care education in a primary healthcare setting at baseline enabled evaluation of the effectiveness of a diabetic foot education and training program for generalist healthcare professionals. This study employed a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study design. Healthcare practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and practice of diabetic foot assessment, diabetic foot risks, risk stratification, and use of the 2011 National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines were investigated with an electronic pre-test survey(.) Healthcare professionals then undertook a 3-h education and training workshop before completing the electronic post-test knowledge, attitudes and practice survey. Comparison of pre-test/post-test survey findings was used to assess the change in knowledge, attitudes and intended practice due to the workshops. Two hundred and forty-six healthcare professionals from two rural and remote health regions of Western Australia participated in training workshops. Monofilaments and diabetes foot care education brochures, particularly brochures for Aboriginal people, were reported as not readily available in rural and remote health services. For most participants (58 %), their post-test knowledge score increased significantly from the pre-test score. Use of the Guidelines in clinical settings was low (19 %). The healthcare professionals' baseline diabetic foot knowledge was adequate to correctly identify the high risk category. However, stratification of the intermediate risk category was poor, even after training. This study reports the first assessment of Western Australia's rural and remote health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the diabetic foot. It shows that without training, generalists' levels of knowledge concerning the diabetic foot was low and they were unlikely to assess foot risk. The findings from this study in a rural and remote setting cast doubt on the ability of generalist healthcare professionals to stratify risk appropriately, especially for those at intermediate risk, without clinical decision support tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 14 11%
Lecturer 13 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 36 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 39 32%