| Title |
Classical peer review: an empty gun
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bcr2742 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,402 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 263 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 137 | 10% |
| Spain | 45 | 3% |
| Australia | 44 | 3% |
| Canada | 44 | 3% |
| Germany | 36 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 36 | 3% |
| France | 20 | 1% |
| India | 16 | 1% |
| Other | 193 | 14% |
| Unknown | 568 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 915 | 65% |
| Scientists | 368 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 67 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 50 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 105 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 27% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 18% |
| Psychology | 14 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 592. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#39,590
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#7
of 2,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108
of 194,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.