The fate of a “calorie” of food depends completely on its specific molecular composition, the composition of the foods accompanying it, and how those molecules interact with our current metabolic and nutritional state (aka satiety).
@DavidMe17661988 @KingManninen @Georgie040575 @Shane_of_AZ CICO isn't valide because a calorie is not a calorie 🤷♂️ https://t.co/KXynwJicOl
@Hair_Artiste You'll appreciate this https://t.co/KXynwJicOl
@Daderp1242389 @RoyCalbeck @DoctorChrisVT @DaveStudland @MDC12345678 @georgeeaton Well, except that stopping at 'the first law' doesn't take into account 'the second law' https://t.co/ZRjjfQKlbS
Certains justifient le CICO comme simple application des principes de thermodynamique mais ce n'est pas correct Ce 1er papier démontre que le CICO n'est pas un modèle causal d'obésité https://t.co/fcAQSVxUii https://t.co/ck5dmf9G6H https://t.co/CCKe4TDSr
@miikaaulio @JariParantainen Tästä voi aloittaa aiheeseen tutustumisen https://t.co/kVBh1jlY6B
@RockAppleWood @DoctorTro The fact is if you eat fewer calories than you burn you will lose weight. Even if you eat nothing but McDonald's. Might want to read up son. https://t.co/PZeeUNysgF
@jscoppe1 @Lukewearechange Tbf, "within days" meant closer to a week. While it wasn't sugar related, I agree inflammation likely played a role. If you don't think shady ingredients impact metabolism, you haven't been paying attention. Plus, If we're refer
The dictum that a "calorie is a calorie" violates the second law of thermodynamics, as a matter of principle. https://t.co/gwWva7JTh7.
RT @AndreeaNRD: The two wrote a paper in 2004 called "'A calorie is a calorie' violates the second law of thermodynamics" 👇 https://t.co/gc…
The two wrote a paper in 2004 called "'A calorie is a calorie' violates the second law of thermodynamics" 👇 https://t.co/gc1PBvjC1i 2/2
@brush_advice @PatientGenXer @monitoringbias Your view is outdated, more recent research contradicts it. Further, your example of yourself is both contradicting your own position as well as pointless for generalizing over a population. Muted. https://t.co
@Alex__Katz @RobGeorge @garytaubes @bigfatsurprise Ummm...do you really think it's a matter of thermodynamics? Please read the following scientific paper: https://t.co/PokTms7KSW
Another reductionist does not understand the human organism isn’t a closed system. Wow. Feinman, R. D., and E. J. Fein. 2004. “‘A Calorie Is a Calorie’ Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics.” Nutr. J. https://t.co/mNtmdu0Q3Y
https://t.co/pBasOAIukp if you know how to read academic papers this one might be helpful and is pretty simple for a paper imo! I'll try and find some more later but
@BioLayne CICO means G=H. Which is a fine estimate of thermodynamics in the short term. A plain scholarly discussion of the matter in 2004 https://t.co/DUoMiOWrYI For all the talk of thermodynamics in nutrition, entropic generation is rarely mentioned.
@Chandle74418127 Are you sure about that ? https://t.co/ksYEhOjvu8
@davidbelle_ @DaveClift_ during a body recomp program, you can easily average 400kcal extra a day, and still loose fat + gain muscle. its not about the kcals in/out, its about the type of kcals and where is the energy being used. https://t.co/PkewXYGXH
Porque al comparar balance energético entre tratamientos dietéticos, esta la energía metabolizable y se favorecen algunas reacciones de vías metabólicas, luego la empírica "ventaja metabólica" y variaciones en gasto de energía. Se complica todo. https://t.
@SportHackDave The video categorically debunks the applicability of the first; this link severs any connection with the second: https://t.co/sJ72s2cQmk
@davidludwigmd @garytaubes @davykevinp @JohnSpeakman4 More importantly, the CIM is also consistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which CICO appears to violate 👇 https://t.co/gc1PBvjC1i
It seems odd that we would choose to believe that only one of the laws of thermodynamics applies to biological systems. Yes, energy conservation factors in, but so does energy dissipation https://t.co/dS3a4bSkWf 2/2
@davidludwigmd @USDA Excellent article @davidludwigmd I'm only a bit confused why nobody ever mentions the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which suggests low carb diets cause "energy dissipation". Have you read "'A calorie is a calorie' violates the 2nd law of
'A calorie is a calorie' violates the second law of thermodynamics (@DrFeinman Eugene J. Fine - @ncbi) https://t.co/k2yF2RYg5d
bodybuilders have known this for decades but I guess it's not "knowledge" until a scientist writes a paper about it or whatever
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/TrHGsEUe4B comm: https://t.co/1LY84yP6Zf
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/qgUcu5pgpb
RT @newsycombinator: “A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/AMEfnUN4Cl
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/ryhwxq42Iv (https://t.co/qBpDJUrnEW)
RT @newsycombinator: “A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/AMEfnUN4Cl
> The second law of thermodynamics says that variation of efficiency for different metabolic pathways is to be expected. Thus, ironically the dictum that a "calorie is a calorie" violates the second law of thermodynamics, as a matter of principle. https
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/cPmzTgMfQo
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) (by wrycoder) https://t.co/Y4jrMdznq9
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/2PNhUE9YMO (https://t.co/2krWkCeO4a)
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/AMEfnUN4Cl
RT @akbarth3great: “A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/63Rvg1wBXl
RT @akbarth3great: “A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/63Rvg1wBXl
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) https://t.co/q51voR0ATk
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004): https://t.co/9y2V7rQIzC Comments: https://t.co/m7RiAIfdXR
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) Link: https://t.co/i8ekl93gKx Comments: https://t.co/A1LYdrs04s
“A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics (2004) L: https://t.co/gfxWnUQCgy C: https://t.co/1PzmOLPoY2
@SplFit It doesn't matter how many calories we ingest, it matters how they are used/stored. Without insulin, we can't store fat, too much insulin, we can't move fat. https://t.co/ZixCOcbFfS
RT @Chrest_brett: @dlifein @RobSpence67 @BioLayne You are right, this has been a debated topic: https://t.co/97TDpF40vF https://t.co/LP90AN…
@figuregirl77 Some reading for you... 🤦🏼♂️ https://t.co/BGqxRC2njs
@DRTrading123 @figuregirl77 So you claim to be a teacher and are always learning yet you can’t be arsed to look for yourself? 🤦🏼♂️ FYI Richard Feinman is a professor of biochemistry studying nutrition and metabolism. https://t.co/BGqxRC2njs
@ChrisKirk_ASP @Listlad @HearmonJanet @Glasgow52 Here’s another one for you buddy. Maybe they also don’t understand? https://t.co/zKHpSm52lA
@2Min_Keto @AviBittMD Sure, I linked it in my reply here. It's quite a good paper. https://t.co/McY4ym44AJ
@The_Nutrivore @haroldmendez “A calorie is a calorie” violates the second law of thermodynamics. https://t.co/YfHnvr1eGh
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @seanclancy75: "A calorie is a calorie" violates the second law of #thermodynamics | #Nutrition Journal | Full Text #weightloss #fitness…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @altitudepooper: @BioLayne Calories are important, but for the sake of nuance. https:…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
RT @BioLayne: A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calorie…
A calorie is simply a unit of energy. Not all SOURCES of calories have the same impact on energy expenditure, but all calories are calories. Subtle difference but there are no laws of thermodynamics being violated
@BioLayne Calories are important, but for the sake of nuance. https://t.co/sJzGvUToL4
@izzynobre E é ignorar também a segunda lei da termodinâmica. Comer menos carboidratos, numa pessoa saudável, reduz os níveis de insulina, aceleram a perda de gordura (lipólise do tecido adiposo). Façam low carb ;) https://t.co/pO38qyRqLR
@skystebnicki @DrNadolsky Here is an article you might find interesting. https://t.co/WkIV5WHBN7
@MaureenStroud @HenningLanger @puddleg @ProfTimNoakes @UCDavisHealth I agree with you. (I wrote that.) To @HenningLanger, I don't disagree that you need an energy deficit for weight loss but the claim "a calorie is a calorie" is false. See also: https://
@AnsmithRD @ben_holmes5150 @LOWCARB_TOOLBOX @BioLayne I’m saying the laws of thermodynamics don’t apply to human physiology. https://t.co/V96PHR2sTi
@nietito10_ @juice_journo @LOWCARB_TOOLBOX Keep reading. In that part, the paper was discussing what was currently in the literature. CICO is not a law. The laws of thermodynamics are, and using them for human physiology is flawed. https://t.co/HfW1vfctdo
@KristineMaria @nickjlo @synapse101 Or why germ free mice weigh less than their litter mates? Isn't it just about calories? Couldn't different foods inform our metabolism differently? https://t.co/vAvs8n3X7T
@matt_ed2465 @BarryCPearson @JeffMindrup @fuelled_by_keto @ProfTimNoakes @TheNoakesF Absolutely. I'm less familiar with the metabolic changes for carb consumption though. Did you read this article I gave you? Tons of factors affect metabolism.. ketosis, in
@matt_ed2465 @JeffMindrup @fuelled_by_keto @ProfTimNoakes @TheNoakesF Humans aren't steam engines. You can get people to lose weight simply by reducing inflammation of inducing hyperthyroidism or renting a pancreatic tumor. https://t.co/vAvs8nlxZr
@BarryCPearson @MichaelSagnerMD @THEELC @DoctorTro Agree! "A calorie is a calorie" violates the second law of thermodynamics.... best explained in this paper https://t.co/Q18z8nBBXE
@tranquilpotato @buddha_web aand peer reviewed papers https://t.co/sAQQ9teP4U https://t.co/2pq6w52TZp 🤷♂️
@jasonmparsons @HeyNickMitchell The simple version currently portrayed violates the second law of thermodynamics: https://t.co/REFsbqLZ8T
Fat loss is about math, mmkay. https://t.co/MzeX6ifb7C
One of his claims in his article I responded to reduces to "a calorie is a calorie." He said that there's no getting around "thermodynamics." Ironically, stating that a calorie is a calorie violates the second law of thermodynamics. https://t.co/KGFFU9zYg
@brank20 @TnTaves @tednaiman @sbaker Here's the scientific study: https://t.co/jXJacJ6urZ IF you can't comprehend it, no one can help you! Good bye and good luck...!!! 😂😂😂
@dlifein @RobSpence67 @BioLayne You are right, this has been a debated topic: https://t.co/97TDpF40vF https://t.co/LP90ANoDCT But this highlights thermic effect of protein..TEF..which is within & accounted for in expenditure! Not a big difference once