RT @teortaxesTex: @ZourrexSlim - Abiogenesis is implausible even in optimal conditions; see Koonin https://t.co/IoQCxRx8y3 - Fermi paradox…
@ZourrexSlim - Abiogenesis is implausible even in optimal conditions; see Koonin https://t.co/IoQCxRx8y3 - Fermi paradox is confused to begin with, as shown by @anderssandberg https://t.co/EB2xNXqw7D - Earth had very diverse yet mild conditions, such pla
Koonin applies multiverse reasoning to explain the origin of life. He does this on the basis that the chance of a replication-translation RNA system arising is P < 10 to the -1018. @Philip_Goff's critique of multiverse reasoning might apply here.
The mathematical probability of abiogenesis is 0. It takes a lot of blind faith in “science” and requires some bizarre assumptions to reconcile a mathematical impossibility. https://t.co/XbCCkGKrKz
@EmigrantMK @DanielWachowiak Wedle życzenia https://t.co/U8XeHEjSjS
@Radek_TK @JacekPiekara Wbrew przeciwnie, najnowsze badania pokazują, że prawdopodobieństwo samoistnego zaistnienia życia (samoreprodukcja RNA) jest niemal zerowa ~ 10^(-1081). To oznacza, że 1) jesteśmy sami we wszechświecie 2) do naszej ewolucji potrzeb
@MadS100tist @SCEdmunds Happy to oblige uh-huh https://t.co/bKTPlJJmLb
@AleMartnezR1 @CapturingChrist @SpeedWatkins This is the biggest objection I have. The evidence from molecular biology is as powerful (or more so) than evidence from fine tuning. Some biologist invoke the multiverse because they know the explanatory pro
@ApologistAunty @DrFrankTurek Here's one evolutionist, Eugene Koonin, who recognizes that IC systems can't evolve by chance, and this is why he proposes the multiverse theory to multiply the chances. https://t.co/WrU0eh92gG
@robinhanson Mr. Hanson, are you aware of Koonin's estimate of the likelihood of abiogenesis? If he's right, there's essentially zero possibility of non-terrestial life forms (before WE seed the Galaxy). https://t.co/qSS0Pimcjx https://t.co/utQkKpv4OV For
@s4nt4tweet 2/2 aux multivers pour réduire le caractère impossible/improbable de l'apparition de la vie https://t.co/QJ9FvcauDF
RT @textortexxel: @PyreResonant I think we need a better framework for thinking about "probabilities" of events that predetermine our abili…
@PyreResonant I think we need a better framework for thinking about "probabilities" of events that predetermine our ability to observe anything at all. BB is prima facie implausible in our world, but that's irrelevant. Consider this: https://t.co/qSS0Pimc
RT @LaptopBiologist: @pastramimachine Side note: My other favorite "What did I just read and how do I know if I disagree?" paper is Eugene…
@pastramimachine Side note: My other favorite "What did I just read and how do I know if I disagree?" paper is Eugene Koonin's coupling of the Anthropic Principle and inflationary models of the universe to make arguments about the origin of life: https://t
@PiispaJari Artikkeli oli mielenkiintoinen. Hieman samanlainen “päätyyn” menevä ajattelu paljastaa myös naturalistisen evoluutioteorian heikon tieteellisen perustan, kun sen todetaan joko seisovan tai kaatuvan kovinkin epätieteellisen multiversumi-ideologi
https://t.co/kW9kEVmf7O Pari huomiota artikkelista: Todennäköisyys primitiivisen replikaatio+translaatiomekanismin syntymälle sattumalta on <10^(-1000). Ainoa ratkaisu artikkelin perusteella on multiversumi, josta ei ole mitään tieteellistä näyttöä,
Some brutally honest quotes about #abiogenesis in this paper from Koonin https://t.co/rVDlTeG1QZ
Biology Direct launched its RNA world rep w Voltaire & Elvis http://t.co/jvQ9IxN3; now "Protein First" enters the fray http://t.co/CgTZnJPV