↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – A clinically empirical approach to its definition and study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – A clinically empirical approach to its definition and study
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2005
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-3-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

William C Reeves, Dieter Wagner, Rosane Nisenbaum, James F Jones, Brian Gurbaxani, Laura Solomon, Dimitris A Papanicolaou, Elizabeth R Unger, Suzanne D Vernon, Christine Heim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 98 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 32%
Psychology 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,031,318
of 23,914,787 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#722
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,380
of 156,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.