↓ Skip to main content

A perspective on SIDS pathogenesis. The hypotheses: plausibility and evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
A perspective on SIDS pathogenesis. The hypotheses: plausibility and evidence
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul N Goldwater

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Other 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 13 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2011.
All research outputs
#15,369,584
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,631
of 2,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,828
of 188,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them