↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter as an estimate of central venous pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
Title
The efficacy of sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter as an estimate of central venous pressure
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12947-016-0076-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Ciozda, Ilan Kedan, Devin W. Kehl, Raymond Zimmer, Raj Khandwalla, Asher Kimchi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Unknown 237 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 13%
Other 31 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 9%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 61 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 73 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#87
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,794
of 359,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.