↓ Skip to main content

Methods for environmental change; an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Methods for environmental change; an exploratory study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerjo Kok, Nell H Gottlieb, Robert Panne, Chris Smerecnik

Abstract

While the interest of health promotion researchers in change methods directed at the target population has a long tradition, interest in change methods directed at the environment is still developing. In this survey, the focus is on methods for environmental change; especially about how these are composed of methods for individual change ('Bundling') and how within one environmental level, organizations, methods differ when directed at the management ('At') or applied by the management ('From').

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 5%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 19%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,420,413
of 13,243,534 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,714
of 9,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,116
of 249,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#122
of 1,051 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,051 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.