↓ Skip to main content

Methods for environmental change; an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Methods for environmental change; an exploratory study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerjo Kok, Nell H Gottlieb, Robert Panne, Chris Smerecnik

Abstract

While the interest of health promotion researchers in change methods directed at the target population has a long tradition, interest in change methods directed at the environment is still developing. In this survey, the focus is on methods for environmental change; especially about how these are composed of methods for individual change ('Bundling') and how within one environmental level, organizations, methods differ when directed at the management ('At') or applied by the management ('From').

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2013.
All research outputs
#3,239,466
of 24,498,639 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,782
of 16,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,243
of 286,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#60
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,498,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.