| Title |
Embedding chiropractic in Indigenous Health Care Organisations: applying the normalisation process model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-429 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara I Polus, Charlotte Paterson, Joan van Rotterdam, Dein Vindigni |
| Abstract |
Improving the health of Indigenous Australians remains a major challenge. A chiropractic service was established to evaluate this treatment option for musculoskeletal illness in rural Indigenous communities, based on the philosophy of keeping the community involved in all the phases of development, implementation, and evaluation. The development and integration of this service has experienced many difficulties with referrals, funding and building sustainability. Evaluation of the program was a key aspect of its implementation, requiring an appropriate process to identify specific problems and formulate solutions to improve the service. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,140,433
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,429
of 7,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,882
of 276,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#73
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.