↓ Skip to main content

Selection of the appropriate method for the assessment of insulin resistance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Selection of the appropriate method for the assessment of insulin resistance
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anwar Borai, Callum Livingstone, Ibrahim Kaddam, Gordon Ferns

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 219 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 16%
Student > Master 31 13%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 54 23%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 45 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,241,383
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,073
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,821
of 240,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.