Title |
Prevalences and associated risk factors of HCV/HIV co-infection and HCV mono-infection among injecting drug users in a methadone maintenance treatment program in Taipei, Taiwan
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1066 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yung-Feng Yen, Muh-Yong Yen, Lien-Wen Su, Lan-Huei Li, Peing Chuang, Xiao-Ru Jiang, Chung-Yeh Deng |
Abstract |
Injecting drug users (IDUs) in Taiwan contributed significantly to an HIV/AIDS epidemic in 2005. In addition, studies that identified risk factors of HCV/HIV co-infection among IDUs were sparse. This study aimed to identify risk factors of HCV/HIV co-infection and HCV mono-infection, as compared with seronegativity, among injecting drug users (IDUs) at a large methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP) in Taipei, Taiwan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Thailand | 1 | 17% |
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,088,799
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,424
of 14,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,235
of 278,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#129
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.