| Title |
Mondia whitei (Periplocaceae) prevents and Guibourtia tessmannii (Caesalpiniaceae) facilitates fictive ejaculation in spinal male rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Watcho, Patrick Brice Deeh Defo, Modeste Wankeu-Nya, Miguel Carro-Juarez, Telesphore Benoît Nguelefack, Albert Kamanyi |
| Abstract |
Mondia whitei and Guibourtia tessmannii are used in Cameroon traditional medicine as aphrodisiacs. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the pro-ejaculatory effects of the aqueous and organic solvent extracts of these plants in spinal male rats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,548,591
of 23,937,668 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,210
of 3,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,435
of 287,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,937,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.