↓ Skip to main content

FishNet: an online database of zebrafish anatomy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


49 Dimensions

Readers on

137 Mendeley
2 CiteULike
FishNet: an online database of zebrafish anatomy
Published in
BMC Biology, August 2007
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-5-34
Pubmed ID

Robert J Bryson-Richardson, Silke Berger, Thomas F Schilling, Thomas E Hall, Nicholas J Cole, Abigail J Gibson, James Sharpe, Peter D Currie

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Austria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 125 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 15%
Physics and Astronomy 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 14 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
of 18,119,184 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 273,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,119,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them