↓ Skip to main content

Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marloes WJL Schmitz, Vincent JJF Busch, Jean WM Gardeniers, Jan CM Hendriks, René PH Veth, B Willem Schreurs

Abstract

The number of total hip arthroplasties in patients under 30 years is increasing over the years. Almost all of them will face at least one or more future revisions in their life. Therefore, the implant used should have a high survival rate, and needs to be easily revisable resulting in a low re-revision rate. Several studies have evaluated the outcome of total hip arthroplasties in patients under 30 years. However, only a few reported on the follow-up outcome of 10 years or more. In addition, none of these reports published data of the subsequent revisions of these implants within their original report.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 61%
Engineering 4 11%
Materials Science 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2013.
All research outputs
#3,064,200
of 4,504,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,042
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,134
of 285,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#101
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,504,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.