↓ Skip to main content

What differences are detected by superiority trials or ruled out by noninferiority trials? A cross-sectional study on a random sample of two-hundred two-arms parallel group randomized clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
What differences are detected by superiority trials or ruled out by noninferiority trials? A cross-sectional study on a random sample of two-hundred two-arms parallel group randomized clinical trials
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angèle Gayet-Ageron, Thomas Agoritsas, Christophe Combescure, Krisztina Bagamery, Delphine S Courvoisier, Thomas V Perneger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Austria 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Psychology 8 33%
Unspecified 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2016.
All research outputs
#9,905,968
of 12,373,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#916
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,851
of 262,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them