↓ Skip to main content

A mixed exercise training programme is feasible and safe and may improve quality of life and muscle strength in multiple myeloma survivors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
A mixed exercise training programme is feasible and safe and may improve quality of life and muscle strength in multiple myeloma survivors
Published in
BMC Cancer, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Groeneveldt, Gill Mein, Rachel Garrod, Andrew P Jewell, Ken Van Someren, Richard Stephens, Shirley P D’Sa, Kwee L Yong

Abstract

Exercise programmes are beneficial for cancer patients however evidence is limited in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), a cancer that is characterised by osteolytic bone disease, giving rise to high levels of bone morbidity including fractures and bone pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Unspecified 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Other 27 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 37%
Unspecified 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 19%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,432,180
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,382
of 4,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,537
of 259,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.