| Title |
CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Watts, Anna Mackenzie, Cherian Thomas, Al Griskaitis, Louise Mewton, Alishia Williams, Gavin Andrews |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 19% |
| Australia | 4 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 700 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 670 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 138 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 15% |
| Researcher | 97 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 6% |
| Other | 112 | 16% |
| Unknown | 135 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 234 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 46 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 4% |
| Other | 84 | 12% |
| Unknown | 159 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#663,578
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#170
of 5,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,070
of 297,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#3
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.