| Title |
PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-9-322 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cuong Than, Derek Ruths, Luay Nakhleh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 305 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 25% |
| Researcher | 70 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 176 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,075
of 7,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,277
of 82,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.