| Title |
Meat consumption and mortality - results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| URN |
urn:nbn:no-uit_munin_5734
|
| Authors |
Sabine Rohrmann, Kim Overvad, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Marianne U Jakobsen, Rikke Egeberg, Anne Tjønneland, Laura Nailler, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Vittorio Krogh, Domenico Palli, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, Manuela M Bergmann, Heiner Boeing, Kuanrong Li, Rudolf Kaaks, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicholas J Wareham, Francesca L Crowe, Timothy J Key, Androniki Naska, Antonia Trichopoulou, Dimitirios Trichopoulos, Max Leenders, Petra HM Peeters, Dagrun Engeset, Christine L Parr, Guri Skeie, Paula Jakszyn, María-José Sánchez, José M Huerta, M Luisa Redondo, Aurelio Barricarte, Pilar Amiano, Isabel Drake, Emily Sonestedt, Göran Hallmans, Ingegerd Johansson, Veronika Fedirko, Isabelle Romieux, Pietro Ferrari, Teresa Norat, Anne C Vergnaud, Elio Riboli, Jakob Linseisen |
| Abstract |
Recently, some US cohorts have shown a moderate association between red and processed meat consumption and mortality supporting the results of previous studies among vegetarians. The aim of this study was to examine the association of red meat, processed meat, and poultry consumption with the risk of early death in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 614 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 78 | 13% |
| United States | 70 | 11% |
| Spain | 38 | 6% |
| Canada | 20 | 3% |
| Australia | 18 | 3% |
| Thailand | 18 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 10 | 2% |
| Mexico | 9 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 79 | 13% |
| Unknown | 266 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 483 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 74 | 12% |
| Scientists | 49 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 786 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 749 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 132 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 15% |
| Researcher | 99 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 11% |
| Other | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 138 | 18% |
| Unknown | 166 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 6% |
| Psychology | 33 | 4% |
| Other | 149 | 19% |
| Unknown | 193 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,778
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#23
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48
of 208,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.