↓ Skip to main content

Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 889)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-227x-11-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric J Lavonas, Anne-Michelle Ruha, William Banner, Vikhyat Bebarta, Jeffrey N Bernstein, Sean P Bush, William P Kerns, William H Richardson, Steven A Seifert, David A Tanen, Steve C Curry, Richard C Dart

Abstract

Envenomation by crotaline snakes (rattlesnake, cottonmouth, copperhead) is a complex, potentially lethal condition affecting thousands of people in the United States each year. Treatment of crotaline envenomation is not standardized, and significant variation in practice exists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Netherlands 2 1%
Unknown 154 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 30 18%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Professor 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 44 27%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 46 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,149,459
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#20
of 889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,482
of 195,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them