↓ Skip to main content

Existence and functionality of emergency obstetric care services at district level in Kenya: theoretical coverage versus reality

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Existence and functionality of emergency obstetric care services at district level in Kenya: theoretical coverage versus reality
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Echoka, Yeri Kombe, Dominique Dubourg, Anselimo Makokha, Bjørg Evjen-Olsen, Moses Mwangi, Jens Byskov, Øystein Evjen Olsen, Richard Mutisya

Abstract

The knowledge on emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is limited in Kenya, where only partial data from sub-national studies exist. The EmOC process indicators have also not been integrated into routine health management information system to monitor progress in safe motherhood interventions both at national and lower levels of the health system. In a country with a high maternal mortality burden, the implication is that decision makers are unaware of the extent of need for life-saving care and, therefore, where to intervene. The objective of the study was to assess the actual existence and functionality of EmOC services at district level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 180 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 21%
Researcher 34 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 36 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Social Sciences 22 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,305,715
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,549
of 7,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,135
of 197,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#63
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.