↓ Skip to main content

The paediatric flat foot proforma (p-FFP): improved and abridged following a reproducibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
The paediatric flat foot proforma (p-FFP): improved and abridged following a reproducibility study
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-2-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Margaret Evans, Hollie Nicholson, Noami Zakarias

Abstract

Concern about a child's flat foot posture is a common reason for frequent clinical consultations for an array of health care and medical professionals. The recently developed paediatric flatfoot clinical-care pathway (FFP) has provided an evidence based approach to diagnosis and management. The intra and inter-rater/measurer reliability of the FFP has been investigated in this study.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Libya 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Other 28 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Unspecified 6 9%
Sports and Recreations 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 6 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,623,328
of 8,008,187 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#159
of 387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,431
of 117,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,008,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.