↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidewij Henneman, Jan C Oosterwijk, Christi J van Asperen, Fred H Menko, Caroline F Ockhuysen-Vermey, Piet J Kostense, Liesbeth Claassen, Daniëlle RM Timmermans

Abstract

Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format on counselees' understanding, psychological well-being, and preventive intentions.Design: Multicenter controlled trial.Setting: Three familial cancer clinics in the Netherlands.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 10 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Psychology 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2013.
All research outputs
#2,655,337
of 12,409,138 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#247
of 1,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,427
of 143,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,409,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them