↓ Skip to main content

The effect of RHIZOMA COPTIDIS and COPTIS CHINENSIS aqueous extract on radiation-induced skin injury in a rat model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The effect of RHIZOMA COPTIDIS and COPTIS CHINENSIS aqueous extract on radiation-induced skin injury in a rat model
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xi-Jing Wang, Shuai Lin, Hua-Feng Kang, Zhi-Jun Dai, Ming-Hua Bai, Xiu-Long Ma, Xiao-Bin Ma, Meng-jie Liu, Xiao-Xu Liu, Bao-Feng Wang

Abstract

Radiation-induced skin injury is a common complication of radiotherapy. The RHIZOMA COPTIDIS and COPTIS CHINENSIS aqueous extract (RCE) can ameliorate radiation-induced skin injury in our clinical observation. But, the protective mechanism of RHIZOMA COPTIDIS and COPTIS CHINENSIS in radiation-induced skin injury remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Librarian 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2013.
All research outputs
#4,961,823
of 9,123,792 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1,240
of 2,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,492
of 124,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#47
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,123,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.