↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ala'a Alkerwi, Nicolas Sauvageot, Sophie Couffignal, Adelin Albert, Marie-Lise Lair, Michèle Guillaume

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 5%
Luxembourg 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 45%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Librarian 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Social Sciences 5 23%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,803,442
of 12,373,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#369
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,095
of 348,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#42
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.