Title |
Opinions on Kampo and reasons for using it – results from a cross-sectional survey in three Japanese clinics
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-108 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lydia Hottenbacher, Thorolf ER Weißhuhn, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Seki, Julia Ostermann, Claudia M Witt |
Abstract |
Traditional Japanese Medicine (Kampo) is often used in Japan, but very little data on its users are available. We investigated who uses Kampo, the reasons and opinions for its use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philippines | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,061,613
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,105
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,737
of 196,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#26
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.