↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Evidence: a useful tool for promoting evidence-based practice?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Evidence: a useful tool for promoting evidence-based practice?
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2003
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-3-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulio Formoso, Lorenzo Moja, Francesco Nonino, Pietro Dri, Antonio Addis, Nello Martini, Alessandro Liberati

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Ecuador 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Unspecified 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Unspecified 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,317,195
of 8,815,676 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,270
of 3,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,771
of 300,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#44
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,815,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.