↓ Skip to main content

Processing of meats and cardiovascular risk: time to focus on preservatives

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
40 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Processing of meats and cardiovascular risk: time to focus on preservatives
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Micha, Georgios Michas, Martin Lajous, Dariush Mozaffarian

Abstract

Dietary guidelines emphasize selecting lean (low-fat) meats to reduce saturated fat and cholesterol, but growing evidence suggests that health effects may relate to other ingredients, such as sodium, heme iron, or L-carnitine. Understanding how meats influence health, and on which nutrients this relationship depends, is essential to advise consumer choices, set guidelines, and inform food reformulations. A recent study published in BMC Medicine involving 448,568 participants in 10 European countries, provides important evidence in this regard. After multivariate adjustment, intake of unprocessed red meat was not significantly associated with total or cause-specific mortality; conversely, intake of processed meat was associated with a 30% higher rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (per 50 g/day, relative risk 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.45) and also higher cancer mortality. These findings are consistent with our previous meta-analysis, based on smaller studies, showing strong associations of processed meats, but not unprocessed meats, with CVD. Preservatives are the notable difference; the calculated blood-pressure effects of sodium differences (around 400% higher in processed meats) explain most of the observed higher risk. Although unprocessed red meats seem to be relatively neutral for CVD, healthier choices are available, including fish, nuts, legumes, fruits, and vegetables. Public-health guidance should prioritize avoidance of processed meats, including the low-fat deli meats currently marketed as healthy choices, and the food industry should substantially reduce sodium and other preservatives in processed meats.See related research article here http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/63.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 21%
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 368. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2023.
All research outputs
#85,446
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#87
of 3,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#492
of 207,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.