| Title |
Protocol for Shoulder function training reducing musculoskeletal pain in shoulder and neck: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoffer H Andersen, Lars L Andersen, Ole S Mortensen, Mette K Zebis, Gisela Sjøgaard |
| Abstract |
Neck and shoulder complaints are common among employees in sedentary occupations characterized by intensive computer use. Such musculoskeletal pain - which is often associated with restricted range of motion and loss of muscle strength - is one of the most common conditions treated by physical therapists. The exact mechanism of neck pain is rarely revealed by clinical examination and the treatment has varied from passive rest to active treatments. Active treatments have often been divided into either training of the painful area or the surrounding musculature avoiding direct training of the painful area. Our study investigates the effect of the latter approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 69 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 83 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#14,825,310
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,298
of 4,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,743
of 181,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.