Title |
Simplifying healthful choices: a qualitative study of a physical activity based nutrition label format
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonas J Swartz, Sunaina Dowray, Danielle Braxton, Paul Mihas, Anthony J Viera |
Abstract |
This study used focus groups to pilot and evaluate a new nutrition label format and refine the label design. Physical activity equivalent labels present calorie information in terms of the amount of physical activity that would be required to expend the calories in a specified food item. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Australia | 2 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Norway | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 18% |
Researcher | 17 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 17% |
Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
Psychology | 12 | 10% |
Other | 28 | 22% |
Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#592,177
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#185
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,208
of 211,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.