↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack Chen, Lixin Ou, Stephanie J Hollis

Abstract

Despite growing interest and urges by leading experts for the routine collection of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in all general care patients, and in particular cancer patients, there has not been an updated comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the impact of adopting such a strategy on patients, service providers and organisations in an oncologic setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Philippines 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 223 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Student > Master 36 16%
Other 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 64 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 46%
Unspecified 33 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Psychology 13 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 5%
Other 43 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,930,680
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,312
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,741
of 147,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.