↓ Skip to main content

The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M Tappin, Linda Bauld, Carol Tannahill, Linda de Caestecker, Andrew Radley, Alex McConnachie, Kathleen Boyd, Andrew Briggs, Liz Grant, Alan Cameron, Susan MacAskill, Lesley Sinclair, Brenda Friel, Tim Coleman

Abstract

Seventy percent of women in Scotland have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help most young women quit smoking before their own health is irreparably compromised. By quitting during pregnancy their infants will be protected from miscarriage and still birth as well as low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. In the UK, the NICE guidelines: 'How to stop smoking in pregnancy and following childbirth' (June 2010) highlighted that little evidence exists in the literature to confirm the efficacy of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers to quit. Its first research recommendation was to determine: Within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 163 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 16%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 45 27%