↓ Skip to main content

The BraveNet prospective observational study on integrative medicine treatment approaches for pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 2,699)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
The BraveNet prospective observational study on integrative medicine treatment approaches for pain
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald I Abrams, Rowena Dolor, Rhonda Roberts, Constance Pechura, Jeffery Dusek, Sandi Amoils, Steven Amoils, Kevin Barrows, Joel S Edman, Joyce Frye, Erminia Guarneri, Ben Kligler, Daniel Monti, Myles Spar, Ruth Q Wolever

Abstract

Chronic pain affects nearly 116 million American adults at an estimated cost of up to $635 billion annually and is the No. 1 condition for which patients seek care at integrative medicine clinics. In our Study on Integrative Medicine Treatment Approaches for Pain (SIMTAP), we observed the impact of an integrative approach on chronic pain and a numberof other related patient-reported outcome measures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Other 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 43%
Unspecified 10 12%
Psychology 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 13 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#302,550
of 13,325,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#49
of 2,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,663
of 152,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,325,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them