↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial stress and strategies for managing adversity: measuring population resilience in New South Wales, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial stress and strategies for managing adversity: measuring population resilience in New South Wales, Australia
Published in
Population Health Metrics, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-7954-8-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Taylor, Margo Barr, Garry Stevens, Donald Bryson-Taylor, Kingsley Agho, Jennifer Jacobs, Beverley Raphael

Abstract

Populations around the world are facing an increasing number of adversities such as the global financial crisis, terrorism, conflict, and climate change. The aim of this paper was to investigate self-reported strategies and sources of support used to get through "tough times" in an Australian context and to identify patterns of response in the general population and differences in potentially vulnerable subgroups.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 20%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 27%
Psychology 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Unspecified 6 12%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Other 9 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,963,238
of 12,543,286 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#178
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,567
of 149,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,543,286 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.