↓ Skip to main content

Frequent use of blood-saving measures in elective orthopaedic surgery: a 2012 Dutch blood management survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Frequent use of blood-saving measures in elective orthopaedic surgery: a 2012 Dutch blood management survey
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronique MA Voorn, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen, Manon M Wentink, Cynthia So-Osman, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Ankie WMM Koopman-van Gemert, Rob GHH Nelissen, Leti Van Bodegom-Vos

Abstract

Blood loss in hip and knee arthroplasties may necessitate allogeneic blood transfusions. Different blood-saving measures (BSMs) were introduced to reduce these transfusions. Purpose of the present study was to assess the frequency of BSM use, stratified by type and hospital setting of orthopaedic departments in the Netherlands.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 78%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,001,175
of 8,059,414 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#685
of 2,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,289
of 128,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#18
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,059,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.