↓ Skip to main content

Process evaluation of podiatric treatment of patients with forefoot pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Process evaluation of podiatric treatment of patients with forefoot pain
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-6-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babette C van der Zwaard, Wim JC Swagerman, Benedicte Vanwanseele, Kees J Gorter, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Petra JM Elders

Abstract

Foot pain is a common problem for people aged 50 and over and occurs more often in women than in men. About 60% of the foot problems are forefoot problems and slightly more than half of these patients seek medical help, mainly in the form of podiatric care. Podiatric treatment of forefoot problems is known to be heterogeneous. The aims of the present study are to describe the podiatric treatment of patients with forefoot pain and to evaluate the podiatric examination and treatment using an expert panel.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 45%
Researcher 4 18%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Master 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 23%
Sports and Recreations 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2014.
All research outputs
#804,665
of 4,729,227 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#96
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,222
of 95,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,729,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.