Characteristics of predatory journals: https://t.co/3PqzOYMtZS
Luego diremos que no estábamos avisados: https://t.co/rU1fhyOTYp
RT @Makkitter: مقارنة قائمة على الأدلة، لمعرفة المجلات المفترسة من المجلات الشرعية. مفيدة للمؤلفين والمحكمين والمحررين وصانعي اي قررات ذات…
مقارنة قائمة على الأدلة، لمعرفة المجلات المفترسة من المجلات الشرعية. مفيدة للمؤلفين والمحكمين والمحررين وصانعي اي قررات ذات علاقة بأي من جوانب #النزاهة_العلمية https://t.co/6d6w5bpgEh
Links dos artigos citados no vídeo: https://t.co/0gKKTYfTA5 https://t.co/3XNRBijJAX
Shamseer et al reference is https://t.co/7YU1VjmypH 2/2
RT @COMResearchCMRC: قبل النشر : كيف تتعرف على المجلات الحقيقية و الوهمية ؟Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals https://t…
RT @COMResearchCMRC: قبل النشر : كيف تتعرف على المجلات الحقيقية و الوهمية ؟Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals https://t…
Well worth reading https://t.co/0XIkgSBf8E
Correlation between "you are doing this wrong" searing tweets and not checking the literature: high. https://t.co/OIhTMU7h0M https://t.co/lSre4lEoMD https://t.co/UxuNyfLUVE https://t.co/gozMKe2N8F https://t.co/C5GvRGh5Jt
@MicrobiomDigest Also, here's a paper on how to recognise predatory journals: https://t.co/943KieK2OW Basically, we should pay attention to spelling errors and distorted images.
@indranilsays @RimaPathak1 @mbnaveenkb @santam @joydeepGonco @Avinashp9Dr @AbhiG_RadOnc @radoncnotes @RajivSarin5 @nature @CellPressNews In addition to what you said, the distinction between real and fake journals needs to be understood clearly, and is oft
If one is never pulled up for this model where one can simple pay to publish, it becomes tremendously unfair for those who put effort. Copernicus is a bogus index, and a lot of people are saying the same. E.g. This @BMCMedicine article (3/n) https://t.co/h
RT @Paperity: If you're trying to tell whether a journal is predatory, pay attention to: - spelling errors, - distorted images, - smaller p…
RT @Paperity: If you're trying to tell whether a journal is predatory, pay attention to: - spelling errors, - distorted images, - smaller p…
If you're trying to tell whether a journal is predatory, pay attention to: - spelling errors, - distorted images, - smaller publication fee #AcademicChatter #openaccess #OpenScience
RT @Paperity: Researchers, beware! Not sure how to tell the difference between predatory and legitimate journals? This paper brings the an…
RT @Paperity: Researchers, beware! Not sure how to tell the difference between predatory and legitimate journals? This paper brings the an…
RT @Paperity: Researchers, beware! Not sure how to tell the difference between predatory and legitimate journals? This paper brings the an…
Researchers, beware! Not sure how to tell the difference between predatory and legitimate journals? This paper brings the answer: https://t.co/lUBBa5v6tW #AcademicChatter #OpenAccess #OpenScience https://t.co/yRocxkIyCF
@singhpveer @AcademicChatter There's an study about characteristics of predatory journals you could check out. It's specific for biomedical journals, but I find the results applicable to other disciplines as well https://t.co/UXWZ12JLSx
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison https://t.co/8L632JEhZw via @LarissaShamseer et al
@adametkin @irenehames Evidently not! See also Table 7 in https://t.co/7YU1VjmypH by @LarissaShamseer et al
@cwhalleypub I'm reminded of this study - plenty of grey between 'predatory' and 'non-predatory', and the challenge is for 'legitimate' journals to up their game https://t.co/7YU1VjmypH
RT @DrMAlAteeq: خصائص المجلات الطبية المزيفة ( الضارية) المحتملة Predatory Medical Journals https://t.co/YmJfEZQDBY https://t.co/CJdnsxtS…
RT @GoungoungaJuste: @NicolasMedaProf Quelques indicateurs commencent à être identifiés : https://t.co/G3NBVtvVI3 Mais il faudrait peut êtr…
@NicolasMedaProf Quelques indicateurs commencent à être identifiés : https://t.co/G3NBVtvVI3 Mais il faudrait peut être d'autres études, pour confirmer le critère de "prédateur" d'un journal. Pourquoi pas un nouvel indicateur : "predatory factor" ? (comme
RT @gracekryan: Can you spot the differences between a legitimate and a predatory journal? Particularly important for early-career research…
RT @gracekryan: Can you spot the differences between a legitimate and a predatory journal? Particularly important for early-career research…
RT @gracekryan: Can you spot the differences between a legitimate and a predatory journal? Particularly important for early-career research…
A very important read! Thanks @gracekryan for sharing!
Can you spot the differences between a legitimate and a predatory journal? Particularly important for early-career researchers still learning the publishing landscape! #phdlife https://t.co/orIJxuSpg3
RT @DrMAlAteeq: خصائص المجلات الطبية المزيفة ( الضارية) المحتملة Predatory Medical Journals https://t.co/YmJfEZQDBY https://t.co/CJdnsxtS…
RT @DrMAlAteeq: خصائص المجلات الطبية المزيفة ( الضارية) المحتملة Predatory Medical Journals https://t.co/YmJfEZQDBY https://t.co/CJdnsxtS…
RT @DrMAlAteeq: خصائص المجلات الطبية المزيفة ( الضارية) المحتملة Predatory Medical Journals https://t.co/YmJfEZQDBY https://t.co/CJdnsxtS…
RT @DrMAlAteeq: خصائص المجلات الطبية المزيفة ( الضارية) المحتملة Predatory Medical Journals https://t.co/YmJfEZQDBY https://t.co/CJdnsxtS…
RT @DrMAlAteeq: خصائص المجلات الطبية المزيفة ( الضارية) المحتملة Predatory Medical Journals https://t.co/YmJfEZQDBY https://t.co/CJdnsxtS…
خصائص المجلات الطبية المزيفة ( الضارية) المحتملة Predatory Medical Journals https://t.co/YmJfEZQDBY https://t.co/CJdnsxtSPY
RT @moocmicro: Características de las revistas fraudulentas según personal del @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinareidad, APCs muy ba…
.@OttawaHospital-eko ikertzaileen iritziz iruzur egiten duten aldizkarien ezaugarriak: larregiko disziplina aniztasuna, APC oso baxuak, irudi lauso edo pirateatuak, artikuluen eskaerak emailez, atzera egiteko politika eza... https://t.co/AKyBrprizs #Zientz
Características das revistas fraudulentas segundo investigadores do @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinariedade, APCs moi baixos, imaxes difusas ou pirateadas, solicitude de artigos por email, falta de políticas de retracción… https://t.co/AKyBrprizs
RT @moocmicro: Características de las revistas fraudulentas según personal del @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinareidad, APCs muy ba…
RT @moocmicro: Características de las revistas fraudulentas según personal del @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinareidad, APCs muy ba…
RT @moocmicro: Características de las revistas fraudulentas según personal del @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinareidad, APCs muy ba…
RT @moocmicro: Características de las revistas fraudulentas según personal del @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinareidad, APCs muy ba…
RT @moocmicro: Características de las revistas fraudulentas según personal del @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinareidad, APCs muy ba…
Características de las revistas fraudulentas según personal del @OttawaHospital: excesiva multidisciplinareidad, APCs muy bajos, imágenes difusas o pirateadas, solicitud de artículos por email, falta de políticas de retracción… https://t.co/AKyBrpITr0 #Ci
RT @moocmicro: Trets de les revistes fraudulentes segons personal de l'@OttawaHospital: excessiva multidisciplinarietat, APC molt baixos, i…
RT @moocmicro: Trets de les revistes fraudulentes segons personal de l'@OttawaHospital: excessiva multidisciplinarietat, APC molt baixos, i…
RT @moocmicro: Trets de les revistes fraudulentes segons personal de l'@OttawaHospital: excessiva multidisciplinarietat, APC molt baixos, i…
RT @moocmicro: Trets de les revistes fraudulentes segons personal de l'@OttawaHospital: excessiva multidisciplinarietat, APC molt baixos, i…
RT @moocmicro: Trets de les revistes fraudulentes segons personal de l'@OttawaHospital: excessiva multidisciplinarietat, APC molt baixos, i…
Trets de les revistes fraudulentes segons personal de l'@OttawaHospital: excessiva multidisciplinarietat, APC molt baixos, imatges difuses o piratejades, sol·licitud d'articles per e-mail, manca de polítiques de retracció... https://t.co/AKyBrprizs #Ciènci
RT @moocmicro: How to look out for fraudulent journals according to researcher @OttawaHospital: excessive multidisciplinarity, very low APC…
RT @moocmicro: How to look out for fraudulent journals according to researcher @OttawaHospital: excessive multidisciplinarity, very low APC…
How to look out for fraudulent journals according to researcher @OttawaHospital: excessive multidisciplinarity, very low APCs, fuzzy or pirated images, email requests for articles, no retraction policies… Read more here: https://t.co/AKyBrpITr0 #OpenScienc
RT @Supriya_S5: @venkat79621 @netshrink @prashanthns You can refer to sites like Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open…
@venkat79621 @netshrink @prashanthns You can refer to sites like Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and OASPA. Check out this: https://t.co/m14ay232Hn. You can also refer to Shamseer and colleagues work on ass
If you're interested in helping legitimate journals distinguish themselves from predatory journals, this by @LarissaShamseer @robertsjasonl @dmoher et al will give you food for thought: https://t.co/7YU1VjmypH
Predatory journals should NOT to be confused with gold Open Access journals (eg, BMCj or PLOS ONE). Predatory journals “...actively solicit manuscripts and charge publication fees without providing robust peer review...” Shamsheer et al (2017) 4/n https://
What do you think guys?? #scicommjc poll about future chat topics!! #predatoryjournals #academictwitter #PhDchat
RT @scicomm_jc: Should we talk about predatory versus legitimate biomedical journals? Here is a paper offering criteria to tell the differe…
RT @MironaKlorek: @KrzychJask "Thirty-one (33%) predatory journals promoted a bogus impact metric – the Index Copernicus Value – versus thr…
@KrzychJask "Thirty-one (33%) predatory journals promoted a bogus impact metric – the Index Copernicus Value – versus three (3%) open access journals and no subscription-based journals." z https://t.co/gSBv2bJKe8
RT @scicomm_jc: Should we talk about predatory versus legitimate biomedical journals? Here is a paper offering criteria to tell the differe…
Should we talk about predatory versus legitimate biomedical journals? Here is a paper offering criteria to tell the difference: https://t.co/u0k8YIDOAn #scicommjc #sciencetwitter
RT @anacleidebatist: Qual é a diferença entre revistas predatórias e revistas científicas legítimas? Estudo publicado na BMC Medicine busco…
Qual é a diferença entre revistas predatórias e revistas científicas legítimas? Estudo publicado na BMC Medicine buscou traçar essa linha. No estudo, é possível ver as características principais das chamadas revistas predatórias, o…https://t.co/nHHyCnBzq6
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison https://t.co/i4f6cKtbpe
RT @mindfulnesslab: Helpful info when considering the right -- if ANY? -- #openaccess journal to submit to! FYI, @ChingNihao @VAnyanso @Emm…
RT @nicolamlow: Blurred lines - this invitation letter bears hallmarks of #predatoryjournals (https://t.co/CiwULOvSxq) but @MDPIOpenAccess…
RT @nicolamlow: Blurred lines - this invitation letter bears hallmarks of #predatoryjournals (https://t.co/CiwULOvSxq) but @MDPIOpenAccess…
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison https://t.co/SmxeWmg1pd https://t.co/YLxgePeDHU
RT @mindfulnesslab: Helpful info when considering the right -- if ANY? -- #openaccess journal to submit to! FYI, @ChingNihao @VAnyanso @Emm…
Helpful info when considering the right -- if ANY? -- #openaccess journal to submit to! FYI, @ChingNihao @VAnyanso @EmmaMcBride_RU
Research authors @oxford_brookes: are you concerned about 'predatory' journals? Shamseer (et al.) offer warning signs (extracted): https://t.co/Xj1IWmh6wS, & remember to Think-Check-Submit (hey, that'd be a great title for an online tool! https://t.co/
RT @RickyPo: THREAD: More questions being asked about MDPI. https://t.co/KIM2WTuz4J
THREAD: More questions being asked about MDPI. https://t.co/KIM2WTuz4J
Blurred lines - this invitation letter bears hallmarks of #predatoryjournals (https://t.co/CiwULOvSxq) but @MDPIOpenAccess publisher is listed in @PubMedHealth @DOAJplus @C0PE #notagoodlook #OpenAccessWeek https://t.co/9T3VLTYXCq
'We identified 13 evidence-based characteristics by which predatory journals may potentially be distinguished from presumed legitimate journals' - https://t.co/37GziQSVDm
RT @COMResearchCMRC: قبل النشر : كيف تتعرف على المجلات الحقيقية و الوهمية ؟Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals https://t…
RT @ProfWhelan: 66% of predatory journals have spelling errors on website! How to spot difference btwn authentic & predatory journal https:…
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison - https://t.co/hsj9HWJxI7
RT @ProfLHunter: Spelling errors, distorted images and "Index Copernicus" -- how to spot predatory journals https://t.co/m57EC5Hykv
RT @Jose_Oliver: Recently, there has been a rise of online journals characterized as ‘predatory’, which actively solicit manuscripts and ch…
RT @Jose_Oliver: Recently, there has been a rise of online journals characterized as ‘predatory’, which actively solicit manuscripts and ch…
Recently, there has been a rise of online journals characterized as ‘predatory’, which actively solicit manuscripts and charge publications fees without providing robust peer review and editorial services: https://t.co/me7cq1quoW
RT @ProfLHunter: Spelling errors, distorted images and "Index Copernicus" -- how to spot predatory journals https://t.co/m57EC5Hykv
Spelling errors, distorted images and "Index Copernicus" -- how to spot predatory journals https://t.co/m57EC5Hykv
They came up with 13 features, and discovered some interesting flaws in the legitimate ones, actually. I hadn't thought about the economic angle of it.
RT @moorejh: Can you tell the difference between predatory and legitimate biomedical journals? https://t.co/2TbzRosjGg HT @gracielagon #pub…
Spoiler: a junky website is a sign. Also much lower pub fees than prestige journals' hybrid spinoffs. Makes sense. They're doing a volume business.
RT @moorejh: Can you tell the difference between predatory and legitimate biomedical journals? https://t.co/2TbzRosjGg HT @gracielagon #pub…
Can you tell the difference between predatory and legitimate biomedical journals? https://t.co/2TbzRosjGg HT @gracielagon #publishing #research #scichat
RT @ATricco: Dr Larissa Shamseer’s @LarissaShamseer brilliant talk at the Dr David Moher Cochrane Methods Symposium @dmoher on predatory jo…
RT @DianaSherifali: If you publish...please read! https://t.co/yjcI0olNRG
RT @ATricco: Dr Larissa Shamseer’s @LarissaShamseer brilliant talk at the Dr David Moher Cochrane Methods Symposium @dmoher on predatory jo…