↓ Skip to main content

Faculty of 1000 evaluation for Nursing home staff's views on residents' dignity: a qualitative interview study.

Overview of attention for article published in this source, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Faculty of 1000 evaluation for Nursing home staff's views on residents' dignity: a qualitative interview study.
Published by
F1000 ( Faculty of 1000 Ltd), September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Braithwaite, Jeffrey, Hinchcliff, Reece

Abstract

Maintaining dignity is an important element of end-of-life care and also of the care given in nursing homes. Factors influencing personal dignity have been studied from both nursing home residents' and staff's perspective. Little is however known about the way nursing home staff perceive and promote the personal dignity of individual residents in daily practice, or about staff's experiences with preserving dignity within the nursing home. The aim of this study is to gain more insight in this.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Librarian 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 17 27%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Psychology 9 14%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,631,149
of 11,580,830 outputs
Outputs from this source
#679
of 3,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,693
of 147,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#15
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,580,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.