↓ Skip to main content

Identification, modification, and implementation of an evidence-based psychotherapy for children in a low-income country: the use of TF-CBT in Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Identification, modification, and implementation of an evidence-based psychotherapy for children in a low-income country: the use of TF-CBT in Zambia
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-7-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura K Murray, Shannon Dorsey, Stephanie Skavenski, Margaret Kasoma, Mwiya Imasiku, Paul Bolton, Judith Bass, Judith A Cohen

Abstract

The need to address the treatment gap in mental health services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is well recognized and particularly neglected among children and adolescents. Recent literature with adult populations suggests that evidence-based mental health treatments are effective, feasible, and cross-culturally modifiable for use in LMIC. This paper addresses a gap in the literature documenting pre-trial processes. We describe the process of selecting an intervention to meet the needs of a particular population and the process of cross-cultural adaptation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 14%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 36%
Social Sciences 46 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 42 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,480,355
of 21,689,971 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#54
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,378
of 207,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,689,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.