↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a population-based HPV vaccination program on cervical abnormalities: a data linkage study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Impact of a population-based HPV vaccination program on cervical abnormalities: a data linkage study
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorota M Gertig, Julia ML Brotherton, Alison C Budd, Kelly Drennan, Genevieve Chappell, A Marion Saville

Abstract

Australia was one of the first countries to introduce a publicly funded national human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program that commenced in April 2007, using the quadrivalent HPV vaccine targeting 12- to 13-year-old girls on an ongoing basis. Two-year catch-up programs were offered to 14- to 17- year-old girls in schools and 18- to 26-year-old women in community-based settings. We present data from the school-based program on population-level vaccine effectiveness against cervical abnormalities in Victoria, Australia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Other 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Other 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 42%
Unspecified 20 15%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Psychology 8 6%
Other 23 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#213,900
of 13,755,511 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#187
of 2,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,174
of 183,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#25
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.