↓ Skip to main content

The interaction of force and repetition on musculoskeletal and neural tissue responses and sensorimotor behavior in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorders

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
The interaction of force and repetition on musculoskeletal and neural tissue responses and sensorimotor behavior in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorders
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary F Barbe, Sean Gallagher, Vicky S Massicotte, Michael Tytell, Steven N Popoff, Ann E Barr-Gillespie

Abstract

We examined the relationship of musculoskeletal risk factors underlying force and repetition on tissue responses in an operant rat model of repetitive reaching and pulling, and if force x repetition interactions were present, indicative of a fatigue failure process. We examined exposure-dependent changes in biochemical, morphological and sensorimotor responses occurring with repeated performance of a handle-pulling task for 12 weeks at one of four repetition and force levels: 1) low repetition with low force, 2) high repetition with low force, 3) low repetition with high force, and 4) high repetition with high force (HRHF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 8 5%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 26%
Engineering 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,302,623
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,175
of 4,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,806
of 213,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#13
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.