↓ Skip to main content

The interaction of force and repetition on musculoskeletal and neural tissue responses and sensorimotor behavior in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorders

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
The interaction of force and repetition on musculoskeletal and neural tissue responses and sensorimotor behavior in a rat model of work-related musculoskeletal disorders
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary F Barbe, Sean Gallagher, Vicky S Massicotte, Michael Tytell, Steven N Popoff, Ann E Barr-Gillespie

Abstract

We examined the relationship of musculoskeletal risk factors underlying force and repetition on tissue responses in an operant rat model of repetitive reaching and pulling, and if force x repetition interactions were present, indicative of a fatigue failure process. We examined exposure-dependent changes in biochemical, morphological and sensorimotor responses occurring with repeated performance of a handle-pulling task for 12 weeks at one of four repetition and force levels: 1) low repetition with low force, 2) high repetition with low force, 3) low repetition with high force, and 4) high repetition with high force (HRHF).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Professor 6 7%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 32%
Engineering 15 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,000,610
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#641
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,068
of 172,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#75
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.