↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of a Carrageenan nasal spray in patients with common cold: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 3,062)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
patent
2 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
q&a
2 Q&A threads
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of a Carrageenan nasal spray in patients with common cold: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Respiratory Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-14-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Ludwig, Elisabeth Enzenhofer, Sven Schneider, Margit Rauch, Angelika Bodenteich, Kurt Neumann, Eva Prieschl-Grassauer, Andreas Grassauer, Thomas Lion, Christian A Mueller

Abstract

The common cold is the most widespread viral infection in humans. Iota-carrageenan has previously shown antiviral effectiveness against cold viruses in clinical trials. This study investigated the efficacy of a carrageenan-containing nasal spray on the duration of the common cold and nasal fluid viral load in adult patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Other 9 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Chemistry 8 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#731,701
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#49
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,263
of 224,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.