Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews | https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k
RT @EnferEvidente: En RS sobre pediatría se busca literatura gris y en otros idiomas pero no varía los resultados https://t.co/RtUp3gdXBX
RT @EnferEvidente: En RS sobre pediatría se busca literatura gris y en otros idiomas pero no varía los resultados https://t.co/RtUp3gdXBX
RT @EnferEvidente: En RS sobre pediatría se busca literatura gris y en otros idiomas pero no varía los resultados https://t.co/RtUp3gdXBX
RT @EnferEvidente: En RS sobre pediatría se busca literatura gris y en otros idiomas pero no varía los resultados https://t.co/RtUp3gdXBX
RT @EnferEvidente: En RS sobre pediatría se busca literatura gris y en otros idiomas pero no varía los resultados https://t.co/RtUp3gdXBX
En RS sobre pediatría se busca literatura gris y en otros idiomas pero no varía los resultados https://t.co/RtUp3gdXBX
RT @arche4evidence: Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/x…
Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k https://t.co/R4ueQYWCPD
Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k https://t.co/utX5Danyrx
Grey Literature in #SRs - contribution of grey lit to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews | https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k https://t.co/u0yGIgEXtE
RT @CADTH_ACMTS: Grey literature in systematic reviews /via BMC Medical Research Methodology @BioMedCentral https://t.co/Pt9a6Tu9ny #medlib…
RT @CADTH_ACMTS: Grey literature in systematic reviews /via BMC Medical Research Methodology @BioMedCentral https://t.co/Pt9a6Tu9ny #medlib…
Interesting reading! https://t.co/95Yy36MKQ6
RT @CADTH_ACMTS: Grey literature in systematic reviews /via BMC Medical Research Methodology @BioMedCentral https://t.co/Pt9a6Tu9ny #medlib…
RT @CADTH_ACMTS: Grey literature in systematic reviews /via BMC Medical Research Methodology @BioMedCentral https://t.co/Pt9a6Tu9ny #medlib…
RT @agadoud: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-Eng... https://t.co/q203NHqXFE #bmcm…
RT @agadoud: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-Eng... https://t.co/q203NHqXFE #bmcm…
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-Eng... https://t.co/q203NHqXFE #bmcmedresmethodol
RT @peteroblenis: Interesting subject and findings. https://t.co/u6qMadSCB9
RT @peteroblenis: Interesting subject and findings. https://t.co/u6qMadSCB9
Interesting subject and findings. https://t.co/u6qMadSCB9
Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k https://t.co/gesqWDyshv
RT @HealthPsychNUIG: Grey literature in systematic reviews: interesting read! https://t.co/QDXi6myrdq
RT @arche4evidence: Grey Literature in #SRs: contribution of grey lit to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/x…
@arche4evidence Glad I incorporated into my #greyliterature chapter #SRs: contribution of grey lit to results in pediatric reviews https://t.co/Mt0Pfse77T
Grey Literature in #SRs: contribution of grey lit to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k https://t.co/QM90ug9eG3
Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k https://t.co/NLBICPCoHW
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
#Greylit in #systematicreviews a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-Eng... https://t.co/erbYc8U0A2 #bmcmedresmethodol
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-Eng... https://t.co/ZflIKYdJ7e #bmcmedresmethodol
RT @HealthPsychNUIG: Grey literature in systematic reviews: interesting read! https://t.co/QDXi6myrdq
RT @HealthPsychNUIG: Grey literature in systematic reviews: interesting read! https://t.co/QDXi6myrdq
Very interesting paper particularly in terms of developing appropriate #RapidReview methodologies! #systematicreviews @CADTH_ACMTS @dmoher https://t.co/fiNfh8yXIB
RT @HealthPsychNUIG: Grey literature in systematic reviews: interesting read! https://t.co/QDXi6myrdq
Grey literature in systematic reviews: interesting read! https://t.co/QDXi6myrdq
RT @arche4evidence: Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/x…
RT @arche4evidence: Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/x…
RT @rmfeatherstone: Grey lit in #systematicreviews: cross-sectional study of its contribution | @lisa_hartling #medlibs #canmedlibs - https…
RT @arche4evidence: Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/x…
RT @arche4evidence: Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/x…
RT @arche4evidence: Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/x…
Grey Lit in #SRs: contribution of grey literature to results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews https://t.co/xSA7c4E77k https://t.co/KrpeDnzLjO
RT @rmfeatherstone: Grey lit in #systematicreviews: cross-sectional study of its contribution | @lisa_hartling #medlibs #canmedlibs - https…
RT @OxEBHC_SR: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-Eng... https://t.co/z2CwlFIel9 #bm…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-Eng... https://t.co/z2CwlFIel9 #bmcmedresmethodol
#GreyLit had "little impact on results"... the problem is knowing when GL will have an impact and precisely articulating that #canmedlibs https://t.co/cGwoBgLA70
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @CADTH_ACMTS: Grey literature in systematic reviews /via BMC Medical Research Methodology @BioMedCentral https://t.co/Pt9a6Tu9ny #medlib…
RT @rapidreviews_i: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports.... https://t…
RT @rapidreviews_i: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports.... https://t…
RT @CADTH_ACMTS: A look at the contribution of #GreyLiterature in #systematicreviews https://t.co/X5V9KXPVjo #medlibs #canmedlibs @library_…
RT @CADTH_ACMTS: A look at the contribution of #GreyLiterature in #systematicreviews https://t.co/X5V9KXPVjo #medlibs #canmedlibs @library_…
RT @rapidreviews_i: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports.... https://t…
Grey literature in systematic reviews /via BMC Medical Research Methodology @BioMedCentral https://t.co/Pt9a6Tu9ny #medlibs #greylit
A look at the contribution of #GreyLiterature in #systematicreviews https://t.co/X5V9KXPVjo #medlibs #canmedlibs @library_cait @SarahCMcGill
RT @JRBtrip: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports... https://t.co/FBrY…
RT @JRBtrip: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports... https://t.co/FBrY…
Grey literature in #systematicreviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution...https://t.co/uizPkadKfX
RT @JRBtrip: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports... https://t.co/FBrY…
RT @JRBtrip: Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports... https://t.co/FBrY…
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports.... https://t.co/cOe9J5cI00
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports.... https://t.co/QsXBU800TO
Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports... https://t.co/FBrYC9DKsn
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
One for you @UEMS_IS - wonder if this is also the case for #systematicreviews that go beyond questions of effectiveness? https://t.co/CSLCFlg3TP
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
One for you @UEMS_IS https://t.co/CSLCFlg3TP
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
Paper finds that the majority of SRs searched for non-English studies and unpublished studies. https://t.co/lYEMACmuc7
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
RT @hildabast: Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co…
Diminishing returns: 129/549 Cochrane reviews searched for non-Anglo/gray literature. Rarely made a difference. https://t.co/CZmJ4LdN9z