↓ Skip to main content

Burden of paediatric Rotavirus Gastroenteritis (RVGE) and potential benefits of a universal Rotavirus vaccination programme with a pentavalent vaccine in Spain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Burden of paediatric Rotavirus Gastroenteritis (RVGE) and potential benefits of a universal Rotavirus vaccination programme with a pentavalent vaccine in Spain
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Diez-Domingo, Nuria Lara Suriñach, Natalia Malé Alcalde, Lourdes Betegón, Nathalie Largeron, Mélanie Trichard

Abstract

Rotavirus is the most common cause of gastroenteritis in young children worldwide. The aim of the study was to assess the health outcomes and the economic impact of a universal rotavirus vaccination programme with RotaTeq, the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine, versus no vaccination programme in Spain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Other 19 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 51%
Unspecified 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,762,069
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,316
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,835
of 222,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#672
of 875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.