↓ Skip to main content

Differences between patients with chronic widespread pain and local chronic low back pain in primary care - a comparative cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Differences between patients with chronic widespread pain and local chronic low back pain in primary care - a comparative cross-sectional analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Viniol, Nikita Jegan, Corinna Leonhardt, Markus Brugger, Konstantin Strauch, Jürgen Barth, Erika Baum, Annette Becker

Abstract

Chronic pain is a common reason for consultation in general practice. Current research distinguishes between chronic localized pain (CLP) and chronic widespread pain (CWP). The aim of this study was to identify differences between CWP and chronic low back pain (CLBP), a common type of CLP, in primary care settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Unspecified 6 7%
Other 24 28%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Unspecified 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,932,941
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,030
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,027
of 307,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#37
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.