Title |
Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-150 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John A Cunningham, Kypros Kypri, Jim McCambridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 282 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 16% |
Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
Researcher | 27 | 9% |
Other | 20 | 7% |
Other | 45 | 16% |
Unknown | 68 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 88 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 12% |
Unknown | 79 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,275,932
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#310
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,854
of 325,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.