Title |
Chemotherapy prescribing errors: an observational study on the role of information technology and computerized physician order entry systems
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-522 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marianna Aita, Ornella Belvedere, Elisa De Carlo, Laura Deroma, Federica De Pauli, Lorena Gurrieri, Angela Denaro, Loris Zanier, Gianpiero Fasola |
Abstract |
Chemotherapy administration is a high-risk process. Aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, type, preventability, as well as potential and actual severity of outpatient chemotherapy prescribing errors in an Oncology Department where electronic prescribing is used. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
Researcher | 15 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 27 | 26% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 32% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
Engineering | 7 | 7% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,638,545
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,158
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,273
of 291,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#67
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.