The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2013

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 2,247)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog
twitter: 144 X users

facebook: 9 Facebook pages
googleplus: 1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation: 100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 263 Mendeley
citeulike: 2 CiteULike

Summary Blogs X Facebook Google+ Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 10 public wall posts from 9 users.

EndNote, 25 Sep 2015

We missed some questions during both our Q

Web of Science, 25 Sep 2015

We missed some questions during both our Q

Evidence-based Preclinical Medicine, 08 Jul 2015

Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/con…

Panafrican Medical Journal, 31 Jul 2014

A study assessing the usefulness of Google Scholar (GS) as a bibliographic database for biomedical systematic review (SR) has…

Cristina Vasiliu, 30 Jul 2014

Patricia F. Anderson, 27 Dec 2013

Delightful!

Wichor Bramer, 26 Dec 2013

Despite the holiday season our article on google scholar is doing great. In three days it has become the most frequently read…

Robert Dellavalle, 25 Dec 2013

Patricia F. Anderson, 23 Dec 2013

Thank you to Guus van den Brekel for sharing our new article.

Guus van den Brekel, 23 Dec 2013

I love this conclusion ... Conclusions "Although its coverage and precision are acceptable, GS, because of its incomplete…